"Scammed" reputation should be auto removed.

[Emoticons101]

Another word, the person who has the "scammer" tag that reputated the trader. That reputation should be auto remove. I saw some people who joined 2-3 days ago has 20 positive reputations from other scammers/multi. I find this so funny because "most" people would think whoever has the most "reputations" has more trust.
For example:
Im trading with this one random who joined a few days ago and he refuses to send first because he said that "I've been doing many trades and came out successfully, you can read my "reputations" if you like". Its true that he has many positive reputations. BUT FROM SCAMMERS / LOCKED / NEW USERS LOL?

[NothingButaPeanut]

I see the problem. Myself I always check the reputation before I decide to deal with someone though. If the reps are given by scammer/locked/100% new people I tend to stay away.

I got a few reps from scammers myself. I did trade with them though. They bought fg from me only to scam someone else later. One guy did a chargeback too.
Removing those reps doesn't feel fair since these reps show I held my end of the bargain.

All in all I don't think it's necessary. Check out the reps before you deal with someone:P

[Dragonelf]

[niceone]

I don't believe in this, I would say that any reputation that has been given should remain, and I think that everybody should be able to give reputation.

What is the difference between a scammer and a regular person when it comes to judgment of an other person?

I would say that it is up to the trader to review the persons who gives the reputation, in order to make a safe trade.

[BringerLight]

no i dont think they should be removed
as they are part of a trade and it his history

[Treyarch]

Voted yes

[Juggalette]

Yes, but I can see this being a major pita to implement. Honestly this site need a total makeover..

[robert4451]

no. it's a bad idea. Peanut stated why. I'd however make it so that once scammer tagged, you can't leave any more rep.

[isma3l]

Voted yes.